How often do NQ gaps fill the same day?

STS ResearchPublished October 8, 2026NQ futures data, June 2010 to May 2025

Short answer. Across 3,500 NQ sessions from June 2010 to May 2025, 63.5% of regular-session gaps traded back to the prior 4 p.m. ET close the same day. Size decides it: 87.1% of gaps under 0.25% filled, against 25.9% of gaps of 1% or more.

NQ trades nearly around the clock, so the gap traders mean is the distance between the prior regular-session close at 4 p.m. ET and the 9:30 a.m. ET open. It fills when price trades back to that close before 4 p.m. the same day.

How does gap size change the fill rate?

The bigger the gap, the less often it filled, and the order held in all three five-year eras.

Gap size (share of 3,500 days) Filled same day Filled by 10:30 a.m. 2010 to 2014 2015 to 2019 2020 to 2025
Under 0.25% (38.2%) 87.1% of 1,337 77.6% 88.1% of 436 84.9% of 502 89.0% of 399
0.25% to 0.5% (26.3%) 62.5% of 920 43.3% 62.0% of 300 56.9% of 320 69.0% of 300
0.5% to 1% (22.4%) 46.2% of 783 22.7% 46.0% of 211 39.5% of 243 51.4% of 329
1% or more (13.1%) 25.9% of 460 4.6% 23.1% of 104 26.4% of 110 26.8% of 246
All gaps 63.5% of 3,500 46.7% 65.7% of 1,051 62.4% of 1,175 62.6% of 1,274

Era columns show the same-day fill rate. "Filled by 10:30 a.m." is a share of every gap in that row.

At an NQ price of 20,000, 0.25% is 50 points and 1% is 200. The median gap was 0.35%, about 70 points.

The two extremes were steady: gaps under 0.25% filled 84.9% to 89.0% of the time in every era, and gaps of 1% or more 23.1% to 26.8%. The middle sizes moved by up to 12 points: gaps of 0.25% to 0.5% filled 56.9% of the time in 2015 to 2019 and 69.0% in 2020 to 2025.

Same-day and first-hour NQ gap fill rates by gap size, 3,500 sessions from June 2010 to May 2025. Under 0.25%: 87.1% same day, 77.6% in the first hour. 0.25% to 0.5%: 62.5% and 43.3%. 0.5% to 1%: 46.2% and 22.7%. 1% or more: 25.9% and 4.6%.Same-day and first-hour NQ gap fill rates by gap size, 3,500 sessions from June 2010 to May 2025. Under 0.25%: 87.1% same day, 77.6% in the first hour. 0.25% to 0.5%: 62.5% and 43.3%. 0.5% to 1%: 46.2% and 22.7%. 1% or more: 25.9% and 4.6%.
Small gaps usually filled, and fast; gaps of 1% or more filled about one day in four, and rarely in the first hour. NQ futures, 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET, June 2010 to May 2025.

Is a fill special, or just a nearby price?

Mostly it is distance. A level the same distance beyond the open, in the gap's direction, was reached the same day 59.9% of the time, against 63.5% for the fill. The fill was reached more often in 11 of the 12 era-and-size cells, by up to 10 points; the exception was gaps of 1% or more in 2010 to 2014, a tie (23.1% filled, 23.1% extended).

When in the day do gaps fill, and in which direction?

Of the 1,165 gaps under 0.25% that filled, 89.1% filled by 10:30 a.m. Of the 119 gaps of 1% or more that filled, 17.6% did.

Gaps down filled slightly more often: 65.7% of 1,527, against 61.7% of 1,973 gaps up, and more often in all four size bands, by 0.3 to 7.2 points.

These are frequencies, not a rule: a 25.9% fill rate for gaps of 1% or more also means 74.1% of them did not fill that day. They describe past behaviour, not a forecast.

How we measured this

For how the overnight session sets the levels the open reacts to, see how to read the NQ and ES daily bias.

For how often the day's high or low is set in the first hour, see how often NQ sets its high or low in the first hour.

STS Futures sends systematic NQ futures signals; see how they work.

Hypothetical performance disclosure (CFTC Rule 4.41). These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss.